Precarious situations

Published: 12 September 2023

This page has been archived. It has been replaced by:

Data on the UK regions with the most difficult economic circumstances for 25 to 29 year olds – measured by levels of unemployment, economic inactivity and lower working-class employment.

Visualisation

Index of ‘precarious situations’, by region (UK, 2018 to 2021 combined)

41 regions in the UK are ranked from the lowest to highest composite scores. They are then divided into 5 equally-sized groups (‘quintiles’), from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). Areas with the highest scores have the most precarious situations for young people.

Q1 - Lowest 20%
Q5 - Highest 20%

Data

Index of ‘precarious situations’, by region (UK, 2018 to 2021 combined)
Region Index of ‘precarious situations’ Quintile
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire 0.30 3
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire 0.33 3
Cheshire 0.24 2
Cornwall and Isles of Scilly 0.49 5
Cumbria 0.00 1
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire 0.19 1
Devon 0.20 2
Dorset and Somerset 0.23 2
East Anglia 0.30 3
East Wales 0.00 1
East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire 0.16 1
Eastern Scotland 0.53 5
Essex 0.22 2
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bath/Bristol area 0.13 1
Greater Manchester 0.51 5
Hampshire and Isle of Wight 0.20 2
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire 0.38 4
Highlands and Islands 0.46 4
Inner London - East 0.46 4
Inner London - West 0.51 5
Kent 0.27 2
Lancashire 0.36 4
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire 0.22 2
Lincolnshire 0.28 3
Merseyside 0.55 5
North Eastern Scotland 0.36 3
North Yorkshire 0.00 1
Northern Ireland 0.48 5
Northumberland, and Tyne and Wear 0.84 5
Outer London - East and North East 0.24 2
Outer London - South 0.53 5
Outer London - West and North West 0.40 4
Shropshire and Staffordshire 0.32 3
South Yorkshire 0.51 5
Southern Scotland 0.19 1
Surrey, East and West Sussex 0.08 1
Tees Valley and Durham 0.29 3
West Central Scotland 0.43 4
West Midlands 0.36 4
West Wales and The Valleys 0.31 3
West Yorkshire 0.37 4
  • Download the data (CSV, 1KB)
  • Download

    For the full download file, see Download the data.


    Summary main findings

    Young people brought up in densely-populated urban areas – including London – tend to have more difficult economic circumstances than young people in rural areas. This contrast shows the importance of looking within areas, as well as between areas.

    London also has a high percentage of young people with promising prospects. This contrast shows the importance of looking within areas, as well as between areas.

    Some areas – for example, Eastern Scotland – do worse for young people's prospects in obtaining higher qualifications, higher earnings and a professional job and for difficult economic circumstances.

    About the data

    This page combines data from the following 3 indicators into a single ‘composite’ score to give a more reliable picture of geographical mobility patterns:

    The data is adjusted for socio-economic background, so it measures how precarious the situations are of young people from similar social backgrounds.

    Indicators are rescaled to make sure they use a common metric. The best-performing area’s score is set to 0, and the least well-performing area’s score is set to 1.

    See the technical annex (opens in a new tab) for more information on how each area was scored.

    Data source

    Labour Force Survey pooled, from 2018 to 2021.

    Areas are those where respondents lived when they were aged 14 years.


    Download the data

    Download full dataset (CSV, 5KB)

    This file contains the following variables:

    • Indicator code
    • Indicator name
    • Area code
    • Area name
    • Area type
    • Value
    • Sex
    • Quintile

    Page history

    Publication release date:

    12 September 2023

    This page has been archived. It has been replaced by: