Promising prospects

Published: 11 September 2024
see all updates

Data on the UK local authorities with the most 'promising prospects' for 25 to 44 year olds – measured by levels of education, professional work, and earnings. The index measures how well young people from similar socio-economic backgrounds do in education and the labour market.

Visualisation

Index of 'promising prospects', by local authority (UK)

203 local authority areas in the UK are put into 5 categories based on their ‘index of promising prospects’ composite scores. The categories are not equally sized – the middle category is larger because most local authorities are very near the average. Areas with the highest scores have the most favourable prospects for young people.

Least
Favourable
Unfavourable
Middle
Group
Favourable
Most
Favourable

Data

Index of 'promising prospects', by local authority (UK)
Region Index of 'promising prospects' Group
Aberdeen city 0.07 Middle Group
Aberdeenshire 0.09 Middle Group
Angus -0.60 Middle Group
Argyll and Bute Islands -0.32 Middle Group
Barking and Dagenham 0.26 Middle Group
Barnet 2.74 Most Favourable
Barnsley -1.79 Least Favourable
Bath and North East Somerset 0.25 Middle Group
Bedford 1.80 Favourable
Bexley 1.30 Favourable
Birmingham -0.38 Middle Group
Blackburn with Darwen -0.48 Middle Group
Blackpool -0.12 Middle Group
Blaenau Gwent -0.58 Middle Group
Bolton -0.22 Middle Group
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole 0.38 Middle Group
Bracknell Forest 0.75 Middle Group
Bradford -0.86 Middle Group
Brent 2.60 Most Favourable
Bridgend -0.77 Middle Group
Brighton and Hove 1.22 Favourable
Bristol -0.13 Middle Group
Bromley 0.95 Middle Group
Buckinghamshire 1.83 Favourable
Bury -0.42 Middle Group
Caerphilly -0.92 Middle Group
Calderdale -0.22 Middle Group
Cambridgeshire county council -0.46 Middle Group
Camden and City of London 2.07 Most Favourable
Cardiff -0.45 Middle Group
Carmarthenshire county council -0.32 Middle Group
Central Bedfordshire 1.42 Favourable
Ceredigion county council -0.52 Middle Group
Cheshire East 1.01 Favourable
Cheshire West and Chester -0.59 Middle Group
Edinburgh city 0.82 Middle Group
Clackmannanshire -0.73 Middle Group
Conwy -0.26 Middle Group
Cornwall and Isles of Scilly -1.40 Least Favourable
Coventry -0.87 Middle Group
Croydon 0.97 Middle Group
Cumbria county council -0.79 Middle Group
Darlington -0.41 Middle Group
Denbighshire county council -0.46 Middle Group
Derby -0.21 Middle Group
Derbyshire county council -0.24 Middle Group
Devon county council 0.14 Middle Group
Doncaster -0.90 Middle Group
Dorset 0.01 Middle Group
Dudley -0.23 Middle Group
Dumfries and Galloway -1.55 Least Favourable
Dundee city -0.34 Middle Group
Durham county council -1.70 Least Favourable
Ealing 2.86 Most Favourable
East Ayrshire -1.03 Unfavourable
East Dunbartonshire -0.86 Middle Group
East Lothian -0.28 Middle Group
East Renfrewshire -0.63 Middle Group
East Riding of Yorkshire -0.52 Middle Group
East Sussex county council 0.61 Middle Group
Enfield 1.39 Favourable
Essex county council 0.36 Middle Group
Falkirk -0.76 Middle Group
Fife -0.99 Middle Group
Flintshire county council -0.41 Middle Group
Gateshead -1.58 Least Favourable
Glasgow -0.84 Middle Group
Gloucestershire county council 0.54 Middle Group
Greenwich 0.97 Middle Group
Gwynedd -0.43 Middle Group
Hackney 1.46 Favourable
Halton -0.54 Middle Group
Hammersmith and Fulham 1.34 Favourable
Hampshire county council 0.60 Middle Group
Haringey 1.39 Favourable
Harrow 2.88 Most Favourable
Hartlepool -1.08 Unfavourable
Havering 0.68 Middle Group
Herefordshire 0.95 Middle Group
Hertfordshire county council 1.83 Favourable
Highland -0.26 Middle Group
Hillingdon 2.17 Most Favourable
Hounslow 2.85 Most Favourable
Inverclyde -0.95 Middle Group
Isle of Anglesey -0.46 Middle Group
Isle of Wight 0.16 Middle Group
Islington 1.37 Favourable
Kensington and Chelsea 1.49 Favourable
Kent county council 0.60 Middle Group
Hull -1.20 Unfavourable
Kingston upon Thames 1.06 Favourable
Kirklees -1.02 Unfavourable
Knowsley -0.60 Middle Group
Lambeth 1.59 Favourable
Lancashire county council -0.42 Middle Group
Leeds -0.21 Middle Group
Leicester 0.60 Middle Group
Leicestershire county council 0.10 Middle Group
Lewisham 1.36 Favourable
Lincolnshire county council -0.68 Middle Group
Liverpool -0.29 Middle Group
Luton 1.34 Favourable
Manchester -0.22 Middle Group
Medway -0.30 Middle Group
Merthyr Tydfil -0.37 Middle Group
Merton 0.83 Middle Group
Middlesbrough -0.45 Middle Group
Midlothian -0.52 Middle Group
Milton Keynes 0.98 Middle Group
Monmouthshire county council -0.49 Middle Group
Moray -0.41 Middle Group
Na h-Eileanan Siar -0.44 Middle Group
Neath Port Talbot -0.50 Middle Group
Newcastle upon Tyne -1.16 Unfavourable
Newham 1.26 Favourable
Newport -0.50 Middle Group
North Ayrshire -1.09 Unfavourable
North East Lincolnshire -1.11 Unfavourable
North Lanarkshire -1.96 Least Favourable
North Lincolnshire -0.89 Middle Group
North Northamptonshire -0.87 Middle Group
North Tyneside -1.15 Unfavourable
North Yorkshire county council -0.13 Middle Group
Northern Ireland -1.52 Least Favourable
Northumberland county council -1.38 Unfavourable
Norfolk county council -0.32 Middle Group
Nottingham -0.23 Middle Group
Nottinghamshire county council -0.60 Middle Group
Oldham -0.35 Middle Group
Orkney Islands -0.03 Middle Group
Oxfordshire county council 0.61 Middle Group
Pembrokeshire county council -0.41 Middle Group
Perth and Kinross -0.63 Middle Group
Peterborough -0.52 Middle Group
Plymouth -0.65 Middle Group
Portsmouth 0.36 Middle Group
Powys county council 0.13 Middle Group
Reading 0.73 Middle Group
Redbridge 2.05 Most Favourable
Redcar and Cleveland -0.66 Middle Group
Renfrewshire -1.21 Unfavourable
Rhondda Cynon Taf -0.96 Middle Group
Richmond upon Thames 2.45 Most Favourable
Rochdale -1.06 Unfavourable
Rotherham -0.94 Middle Group
Rutland county council -0.52 Middle Group
Salford -0.38 Middle Group
Sandwell -0.83 Middle Group
Scottish Borders -1.62 Least Favourable
Sefton 0.28 Middle Group
Sheffield 0.02 Middle Group
Shetland Islands -0.01 Middle Group
Shropshire -0.03 Middle Group
Slough 0.58 Middle Group
Solihull 0.20 Middle Group
Somerset county council -0.49 Middle Group
South Ayrshire -0.79 Middle Group
South Lanarkshire -0.96 Middle Group
South Tyneside -1.77 Least Favourable
Southampton 0.92 Middle Group
Southend-on-Sea 0.67 Middle Group
Southwark 1.80 Favourable
St Helens -0.74 Middle Group
Staffordshire county council -0.44 Middle Group
Stirling -0.50 Middle Group
Stockport 0.47 Middle Group
Stockton-on-Tees -0.92 Middle Group
Stoke-on-Trent 0.08 Middle Group
Suffolk county council -0.62 Middle Group
Sunderland -1.62 Least Favourable
Surrey county council 2.43 Most Favourable
Sutton 0.41 Middle Group
Swansea 0.14 Middle Group
Swindon -0.51 Middle Group
Tameside -0.91 Middle Group
Telford and Wrekin -0.31 Middle Group
Thurrock 0.27 Middle Group
Torbay -0.22 Middle Group
Torfaen -0.81 Middle Group
Tower Hamlets 1.26 Favourable
Trafford 0.11 Middle Group
Vale of Glamorgan -0.18 Middle Group
Wakefield -1.26 Unfavourable
Walsall -0.63 Middle Group
Waltham Forest 0.77 Middle Group
Wandsworth 1.54 Favourable
Warrington 0.35 Middle Group
Warwickshire county council 1.06 Favourable
West Berkshire 0.60 Middle Group
West Dunbartonshire -0.80 Middle Group
West Lothian -0.73 Middle Group
West Northamptonshire 0.32 Middle Group
West Sussex county council 0.73 Middle Group
Westminster 0.99 Middle Group
Wigan -0.62 Middle Group
Wiltshire 0.17 Middle Group
Windsor and Maidenhead 0.78 Middle Group
Wirral -0.53 Middle Group
Wokingham 0.89 Middle Group
Wolverhampton -0.81 Middle Group
Worcestershire county council 0.57 Middle Group
Wrexham -0.35 Middle Group
City of York 0.17 Middle Group
  • Download the data (CSV, 8KB)
  • Download

    For the full download file, see Download the data.


    Summary main findings

    Most local authorities have scores near to the average on the index of promising prospects – this means there is little difference between them.

    Young people brought up in some London boroughs – as well as the Surrey county council, Hertfordshire county council and Buckinghamshire county council areas – have the most ‘promising prospects’. This means they tend to have higher qualifications, earn more, and be in higher occupation levels by 25 to 44 years old.

    Outside London and the home counties, Cheshire East and Warwickshire county council area also have promising prospects for young people.

    There are less favourable prospects for young people who grew up in some parts of the North East, including:

    • Newcastle upon Tyne
    • Sunderland
    • Gateshead
    • Hartlepool
    • South Tyneside
    • Northumberland county council
    • Durham county council

    About the data

    Data source(s)

    Labour Force Survey (LFS), Office for National Statistics

    Time period

    2018 to 2022 combined

    Geographic area

    UK

    What the data measures

    This index brings together 4 measures of promising prospects for young people, as measured by their levels of education, occupational positions and earnings.

    This page combines data from the following 4 measures into a single 'composite' score:

    • Highest qualification – net levels of a university degree among young people in each area after controlling for socio-economic background (SEB)
    • Occupational level of 25 to 44 year olds (professional class occupation) – net percentages of people in professional class jobs in each area after controlling for SEB
    • Occupational level of 25 to 44 year olds (working class occupation) – net percentages of people in working class jobs in each area after controlling for SEB
    • Earnings of 25 to 44 year olds – mean hourly earnings among people in each area after controlling for SEB

    The index of promising prospects adjusts for socio-economic background, and measures how well young people from similar backgrounds do in education and employment.

    Things you need to know

    The areas shown are where respondents lived when they were aged 14 years.

    To increase the number of survey respondents, we have combined the ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ professional classes into a single category. We have done the same with the ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ working classes.

    Data constraints mean that Northern Ireland has to be treated as a single unit. Local authorities have had to be combined in a few other cases.

    Read the [technical annex] for more information on how each area was scored.

    Type of data

    Survey data


    Download the data

    Download full dataset (CSV, 33KB)

    This file contains the following variables:

    • Indicator code
    • Indicator name
    • Area type
    • Area code
    • Area name
    • Time period
    • Socio-economic background
    • Sex
    • Category type
    • Category
    • Category type2
    • Category2
    • Unit

    Page history

    Publication release date:

    11 September 2024

    Editions of this page:

    This page replaces: